<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>B$ Strategery</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery/14</id>
   <updated>2008-07-07T06:06:21Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>An interesting downturn</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/07/an_interesting_downturn.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.521</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-07T06:06:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-07T06:06:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Here&apos;s an interesting tidbit: For blogs with few incoming and many outgoing links, apparently 5 incoming links or less will put out a nice outgoing value, but 6 or more will drop this back down to &apos;lesser&apos; levels. 5 links...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[Here's an interesting tidbit:  For blogs with few incoming and many outgoing links, apparently 5 incoming links or less will put out a nice outgoing value, but 6 or more will drop this back down to 'lesser' levels.  5 links here put out about 12x the blog's actual value, but 6 - 10 links put out only about 4x the blog's total value.

<table class="datatable">
<tr><td></td><th>Inc. Links</th><th>Out. Links</th><th>Value</th><th>Out. Link Value</th><th>Market Share</th></tr>
<tr><td>20:55 06 Jul 2008</td><td>10</td><td>116</td><td>B$10,039,966.89</td><td>B$371,103.15</td><td>0.000136539 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>06:17 05 Jul 2008</td><td>6</td><td>116</td><td>B$6,255,320.07</td><td>B$223,541.50</td><td>0.000082900 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>23:44 03 Jul 2008</td><td>5</td><td>116</td><td>B$4,209,856.18</td><td>B$442,978.13</td><td>0.000083503 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:53 02 Jul 2008</td><td>5</td><td>116</td><td>B$4,042,608.79</td><td>B$428,558.13</td><td>0.000062285 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:37 01 Jul 2008</td><td>5</td><td>109</td><td>B$3,590,355.28</td><td>B$407,601.27</td><td>0.000071000 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:21 30 Jun 2008</td><td>4</td><td>85</td><td>B$2,470,504.71</td><td>B$107,338.08</td><td>0.000077287 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>16:30 29 Jun 2008</td><td>1</td><td>79</td><td>B$560,683.14</td><td>B$88,562.14</td><td>0.000016722 %</td></tr>
</table>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Rises and falls</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/06/rises_and_falls.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.513</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-29T05:31:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-29T05:31:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We were finally seeing some rising values again recently, but have again hit a decline cycle. Some badly timed reindexing and issues with the spiders being down has caused a downward spiral, as the declining values caused blogs that would...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      We were finally seeing some rising values again recently, but have again hit a decline cycle.  Some badly timed reindexing and issues with the spiders being down has caused a downward spiral, as the declining values caused blogs that would have received gains to lose value.  A change in the reindex order may have resulted in gains all around...

This is one important reason why it is important to use the Stock Broker feature for blogs you own shares in, or do some quick calculations for blogs you don&apos;t own shares in.

One quick way that I do this to see if a blog will gain or lose is to just add up the millions and hundred-thousands with a calculator and see if this comes out as higher than the current blog value.  To get a bit more accuracy for small increases, I may round down to the thousands place (ex,  an incoming blog with a value of B$ 1,218,168.92 I&apos;d enter into the calculator as 1218).  A small gain would be enough to warrant a reindex.

Blogs that feed into each other should have the blog with the highest increase indexed first for maximum benefit, buy if you aren&apos;t using the Stock Broker, that&apos;s hard to determine, but any positive trend is a good thing.  Don&apos;t reindex blogs that are to be losers, let them keep the higher value until other incoming blogs catch up.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Falling values again</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/05/falling_values_again.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.498</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-18T02:52:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-18T02:56:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A popular blog that was putting out some nice values to others that link to me recently died, and was promptly removed from the game. As this was one that was pumping out extra value because of the number of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      A popular blog that was putting out some nice values to others that link to me recently died, and was promptly removed from the game.  As this was one that was pumping out extra value because of the number of outgoing links, the trickle down effect resulted in crashing values all around.

There still aren&apos;t enough blogs hitting the target spot to keep values up, losing just that one was a major blow, but if any others can hit the right spot, we&apos;ll see a nice increase again.  If we can get two more, I think we&apos;ll have stable growth, three or more would see a major long term upward movement in values.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Project Bootstrap</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/04/project_bootstrap.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.496</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-01T05:58:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-01T05:58:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Project Bootstrap is well under way. This is the code name I&apos;ve given to my effort to get the values of my blogs back up to where they had been a few weeks back, before the market slid into the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      Project Bootstrap is well under way.  This is the code name I&apos;ve given to my effort to get the values of my blogs back up to where they had been a few weeks back, before the market slid into the toilet.

I had made some early headway, but was foiled when some other blogs that link here changed their links, and crashed their incoming values to me, and it&apos;s been a slow slide ever since, despite my best efforts.  At long last, things have stabilized, and we&apos;re now on the upswing again.

A few other blogs that link here have taken my advise on linking, and increased their outgoing links to about 3x the incoming, and have further linked to those that link to blogs that link to them, seeding things further, and this is now paying off by a nice upward swing.

At this point, just having one more blog increasing their links this way would result in an even greater boost, I&apos;m sure...
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Sweet spot, part 2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/04/sweet_spot_part_2.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.495</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-07T20:24:40Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-07T20:28:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Regarding my last entry, having more than 3x outgoing as incoming is OK, you still get the boost, but obviously the outgoing value is split among all of your outgoing links. One blog I know has over 8x as many...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      Regarding my last entry, having more than 3x outgoing as incoming is OK, you still get the boost, but obviously the outgoing value is split among all of your outgoing links.  One blog I know has over 8x as many outgoing as incoming, and is still seeing the boost.

A rough formula:  Outgoing Value * # of Outgoing Links / Blog Value.  If you&apos;re not hitting the sweet spot, this value will be close to 1.  If you&apos;re hitting it, it will be something around 5-8, depending on the exact ratio of links.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Sweet spot</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/04/sweet_spot.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.494</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-03T05:42:53Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-07T20:24:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I don&apos;t have an exact formula, and probably never will, but the sweet spot for maximizing outgoing link value seems to be to have about 3x as many outgoing links as incoming ones, give or take a few percentage points...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      I don&apos;t have an exact formula, and probably never will, but the sweet spot for maximizing outgoing link value seems to be to have about 3x as many outgoing links as incoming ones, give or take a few percentage points either way.  If you have 10 incoming links, having 30 outgoing will gain you a boost.  20 incoming means 60 outgoing, etc.

Obviously, linking to those linking to you should help.  An idea I&apos;ve been playing with is to also link to blogs that link to blogs linking to me.  As long as I have extra links to spread around, seems like a sound strategy.

Problem is many blogs linking to me are in a freefall at the moment, and many have the wrong number of outgoing links to stabilize things at the moment.  Might have to ride the fall before the upswing can begin.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>To reindex, or not to reindex...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/to_reindex_or_not_to_reindex.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.493</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-28T03:16:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-28T03:23:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>That is the question... The game has a great tool called &apos;Ask your stock broker&apos;, which will let you see at a glance what blogs you hold shares in will benefit from reindexing. Unfortunately, if you&apos;re looking to reindex, say,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      That is the question...

The game has a great tool called &apos;Ask your stock broker&apos;, which will let you see at a glance what blogs you hold shares in will benefit from reindexing.  Unfortunately, if you&apos;re looking to reindex, say, a blog that links to you, there is no easy way to tell if it will go up or down in value.  Do not assume that if your blog is on the rise, that reindexing anything coming in or going out is a good idea.

I&apos;ve found it handy to whip out the old calculator and punch in the numbers manually to see if it&apos;s worth it.  I usually just enter up to the hundred thousand place (B$25,485,434.10 becomes 254, etc, no rounding), and total up everything over 100k in value.  If this is greater than the blog&apos;s current value, reindex.  If it&apos;s very close, then I&apos;ll redo the numbers going down to the thousands place (B$25,485,434.10 becomes 25485), and see what happens there.

If you&apos;re reindexing something that links to you, never reindex if the value is going to drop.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Corporation interest</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/corporation_interest.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.492</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-27T04:19:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T04:24:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I hadn&apos;t been paying attention, obviously, because this whole topic passed me by. Apparently, players investing in corporations who have more than B$ 1Q invested lose out on interest payments. Whoopsie! Obviously, the quick fix is to withdraw funds so...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      I hadn&apos;t been paying attention, obviously, because this whole topic passed me by.  Apparently, players investing in corporations who have more than B$ 1Q invested lose out on interest payments.  Whoopsie!  Obviously, the quick fix is to withdraw funds so that your invested balance is below 1Q, but what to do with the rest?

A solution suggested to me by another player was to create your own new corp, basically a sole proprietorship, with only you as the member.  Corporation interest rates depend on the value of your shares holdings, but with the new math, it isn&apos;t hard to amass sufficient holdings (I have no idea what the cutoff here really is...) to earn the max rate of 0.5%.  So, invest some sum less than 1Q in your corp, then donate any additional funds to the corp that you wish, and make sure that this is set as your primary corp.

You will then earn interest on the invested amount, and the corp will earn interest on the donated funds, which are entirely under your control.  Also, be sure not to reinvest your earnings, or your invested amount will increase to over 1Q, and you&apos;re screwed again.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A new twist...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/_inc_linksout_linksvalueout_li_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.489</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-25T04:31:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T04:08:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I was starting to make sense of things, generally, but this one seems to be a new twist. On the 25th, the outgoing value dropped greatly, with the addition of one incoming link. But earlier, the same incoming and outgoing...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[I was starting to make sense of things, generally, but this one seems to be a new twist.  On the 25th, the outgoing value dropped greatly, with the addition of one incoming link.  But earlier, the same incoming and outgoing numbers kept a high outgoing value.

I suspect that the code is being tightened on what ranges or ratios between these values causes a boost.

<table class="datatable">
<tr><td></td><th>Inc. Links</th><th>Out. Links</th><th>Value</th><th>Out. Link Value</th><th>Market Share</th></tr>
<tr><td>16:05 26 Mar 2008</td><td>44</td><td>117</td><td>B$580,049,341.64</td><td>B$4,957,687.54</td><td>0.000583753 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>05:58 25 Mar 2008</td><td>44</td><td>117</td><td>B$568,162,725.97</td><td>B$4,856,092.53</td><td>0.000668977 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>17:56 23 Mar 2008</td><td>43</td><td>117</td><td>B$535,036,840.72</td><td>B$26,105,754.53</td><td>0.000723254 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>17:02 22 Mar 2008</td><td>44</td><td>117</td><td>B$532,409,243.97</td><td>B$22,616,540.93</td><td>0.000700457 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:18 20 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>117</td><td>B$497,397,552.74</td><td>B$24,011,132.88</td><td>0.000625127 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>19:23 19 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>117</td><td>B$549,205,881.51</td><td>B$18,657,926.28</td><td>0.000676486 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>16:57 18 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>117</td><td>B$581,484,233.49</td><td>B$24,849,757.84</td><td>0.000583006 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>17:36 16 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>118</td><td>B$618,297,066.17</td><td>B$26,199,032.46</td><td>0.000647581 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>15:19 15 Mar 2008</td><td>44</td><td>119</td><td>B$653,288,785.67</td><td>B$27,449,112.84</td><td>0.000669885 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>14:55 13 Mar 2008</td><td>46</td><td>119</td><td>B$712,079,285.80</td><td>B$29,919,301.92</td><td>0.000840431 %</td></tr>
</table>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>More of the same...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/_inc_linksout_linksvalueout_li.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.488</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-25T04:30:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T04:03:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Same as the last one, blog value rose, but the outgoing value dropped greatly. What changed was that the number of incoming links increased, and outgoing decreased. Inc. LinksOut. LinksValueOut. Link ValueMarket Share 18:35 24 Mar 2008169430B$240,193,425.24B$558,589.590.002302039 % 22:15 22...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[Same as the last one, blog value rose, but the outgoing value dropped greatly.  What changed was that the number of incoming links increased, and outgoing decreased.

<table class="datatable">
<tr><td></td><th>Inc. Links</th><th>Out. Links</th><th>Value</th><th>Out. Link Value</th><th>Market Share</th></tr>
<tr><td>18:35 24 Mar 2008</td><td>169</td><td>430</td><td>B$240,193,425.24</td><td>B$558,589.59</td><td>0.002302039 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>22:15 22 Mar 2008</td><td>168</td><td>430</td><td>B$225,171,509.30</td><td>B$523,654.91</td><td>0.002623686 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:20 20 Mar 2008</td><td>167</td><td>432</td><td>B$215,866,633.71</td><td>B$2,822,258.27</td><td>0.002319916 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>21:21 18 Mar 2008</td><td>165</td><td>432</td><td>B$230,679,289.24</td><td>B$2,122,457.59</td><td>0.002393613 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>20:14 17 Mar 2008</td><td>164</td><td>432</td><td>B$203,863,089.22</td><td>B$2,359,527.65</td><td>0.002343670 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>18:39 14 Mar 2008</td><td>161</td><td>433</td><td>B$124,483,359.91</td><td>B$1,437,453.35</td><td>0.002107312 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>19:42 12 Mar 2008</td><td>162</td><td>433</td><td>B$118,944,327.63</td><td>B$1,373,492.24</td><td>0.002246822 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>01:39 11 Mar 2008</td><td>163</td><td>433</td><td>B$131,457,634.49</td><td>B$1,214,390.16</td><td>0.002836590 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>15:10 09 Mar 2008</td><td>165</td><td>431</td><td>B$200,718,483.84</td><td>B$1,862,817.48</td><td>0.002775711 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>22:13 05 Mar 2008</td><td>164</td><td>432</td><td>B$303,869,051.64</td><td>B$3,517,004.07</td><td>0.002334993 %</td></tr>
</table>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Outgoing drops when value increases</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/_inc_linksout_linksvalueout_li_3.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.491</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-22T21:27:41Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T04:08:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Here&apos;s an interesting one, the blog&apos;s value has gone up, but the outgoing value has dropped on the most recent reindex. Incoming links dropped, and outgoing links increased. Inc. LinksOut. LinksValueOut. Link ValueMarket Share 16:30 15 Mar 20084573B$612,589,518.29B$8,391,638.610.000762129 % 19:42...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[Here's an interesting one, the blog's value has gone up, but the outgoing value has dropped on the most recent reindex.  Incoming links dropped, and outgoing links increased.

<table class="datatable">
<tr><td></td><th>Inc. Links</th><th>Out. Links</th><th>Value</th><th>Out. Link Value</th><th>Market Share</th></tr>
<tr><td>16:30 15 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>73</td><td>B$612,589,518.29</td><td>B$8,391,638.61</td><td>0.000762129 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>19:42 12 Mar 2008</td><td>47</td><td>72</td><td>B$768,558,687.84</td><td>B$10,674,427.61</td><td>0.000651856 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>08:42 11 Mar 2008</td><td>45</td><td>72</td><td>B$932,672,310.11</td><td>B$12,953,783.47</td><td>0.000948474 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>17:17 07 Mar 2008</td><td>44</td><td>72</td><td>B$1,378,411,609.05</td><td>B$19,144,607.07</td><td>0.000566954 %</td></tr>
</table>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Bouncing</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/_inc_linksout_linksvalueout_li_2.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.490</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-22T21:19:29Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T04:00:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Here&apos;s one that looks like the blogroll isn&apos;t catching every time, possibly those frequent times when blogrolling.com goes down. Note the change in outgoing link value in relation to the number of outgoing links. Inc. LinksOut. LinksValueOut. Link ValueMarket Share...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[Here's one that looks like the blogroll isn't catching every time, possibly those frequent times when blogrolling.com goes down.  Note the change in outgoing link value in relation to the number of outgoing links.

<table class="datatable">
<tr><td></td><th>Inc. Links</th><th>Out. Links</th><th>Value</th><th>Out. Link Value</th><th>Market Share</th></tr>
<tr><td>12:27 13 Mar 2008</td><td>36</td><td>47</td><td>B$701,962,988.85</td><td>B$14,935,384.87</td><td>0.000535347 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>03:14 12 Mar 2008</td><td>34</td><td>4</td><td>B$949,399,561.34</td><td>B$23,734,991.53</td><td>0.000523554 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>09:33 07 Mar 2008</td><td>33</td><td>49</td><td>B$1,482,723,172.61</td><td>B$30,259,658.62</td><td>0.000515518 %</td></tr>
<tr><td>05:22 06 Mar 2008</td><td>29</td><td>4</td><td>B$2,001,767,836.92</td><td>B$50,044,198.42</td><td>0.000398807 %</td></tr>
</table>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Link values</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/link_values.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.487</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-20T04:57:19Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T03:34:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Blog valuation is the combined total of the incoming links. The incoming link values are the outgoing link values of those blogs. Generally, the higher the value of a blog, the greater it&apos;s outgoing link value. At least, that&apos;s how...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      Blog valuation is the combined total of the incoming links.  The incoming link values are  the outgoing link values of those blogs.  Generally, the higher the value of a blog, the greater it&apos;s outgoing link value.  At least, that&apos;s how it used to be...

Under the new math, this is still generally true, but some blogs put out more value than other, higher valued blogs.  This is one of the interesting twists in the new math.  I&apos;m investigating some examples of this.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Blogroll</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/blogroll.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.486</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-17T02:24:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T03:30:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Some players are using the new blogshares.com version of the blogroll, rather than the original blogrolling.com version. Unfortunately, the javascript version of this is of no use, as the code that parses the blogroll doesn&apos;t know how to find the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      <![CDATA[Some players are using the new blogshares.com version of the blogroll, rather than the original blogrolling.com version.  Unfortunately, the javascript version of this is of no use, as the code that parses the blogroll doesn't know how to find the links in the blogshares version of the roll.  Ack!


I rewrote a php script that allowed me to use this blogroll here:

<code>
&lt;?php

// The standard script for inclusion of a blogroll from blogrolling
// experiences awful timeouts when blogrolling.com is offline.

// blogrolling.php retrieves your blogroll, and caches the results.
// upon failure of blogrolling.com, it presents the cache to the
// visitor, in stead of waiting 30 seconds before a time out
// occurs.

// (c) 2005, Cathelijne Hornstra <scriptsAThornstra.com>
// This script is licensed GPL.
// Modifications by Jim Wright for BlogShares


// Just include from another php file. The webserver needs write
// permissions in the dir where you are calling blogrolling.php from.



// Change into anything you want/need
$cache_lifetime = 60;
$cache_file = "BSblogroll.cache";
$cache_message = "Cannot reach blogshares.com, looking for a cache file";
$cache_notfound = "Sorry, no cache file found";



///////////////////////////////////////////
// No need to change anything below here //
///////////////////////////////////////////

$blogrolling_host = "blogshares.com";
$blogrolling_path = "/bsblogroll.php?type=html";

if($conn = @fsockopen("$blogrolling_host", 80 ,$errno ,$errstr , 1)){
        $request = "GET ";
        $request .= $blogrolling_path;
        $request .= " HTTP/1.0\n";
        $request .= "Host: ";
        $request .= $blogrolling_host;
        $request .= "\n\n";

        fwrite($conn,$request);

            while(!feof($conn)) {
                        $rawroll .= @fread($conn, 255);
                }

        fclose($conn);

        $blogroll = strstr($rawroll,'<a href');

        if (!(file_exists($cache_file))) {
                $file = fopen($cache_file, "w+");
                fwrite($file,$blogroll);
                fclose($file);
        } elseif ((time() - filemtime("$cache_file")) > ($cache_lifetime * 60)) {
                $file = fopen($cache_file, "w+");
                fwrite($file,$blogroll);
                fclose($file);
        }

} else {

        if (file_exists($cache_file)) {
                $blogroll = file_get_contents($cache_file);
        } else {
                $blogroll = "$cache_notfound";
        }

        echo "$cache_message";
        echo "<br />\n";
}

echo $blogroll;

?&gt;
</code>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The new math</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/2008/03/the_new_math.html" />
   <id>tag:www.wrightthisway.com,2008:/Strategery//14.485</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-15T22:49:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T03:30:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Several &apos;new maths&apos; have come and gone, the latest being to change how blogs are valued in the game, and this has led to a lot of renewed interest in shares play, and new strategies to increase profit for those...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Jim</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wrightthisway.com/Strategery/">
      Several &apos;new maths&apos; have come and gone, the latest being to change how blogs are valued in the game, and this has led to a lot of renewed interest in shares play, and new strategies to increase profit for those players with blogs in the game.  I&apos;m working on understanding the math, and use it to my advantage.

Player Eaglehawk has created a blogroll (a list of blogs that can be included on a player&apos;s site to provide links to other blogs in the roll) in the hopes of adding value to players blogs.  This sort of thing has great potential, I believe.
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
